Studiologic SL88 GT mk2 - TP400/W Action in a piano controller

David B I noticed that comment, but I don't know what they are talking about. I've been playing my Numa GT with Ivory tops routinely for over a year and I haven't noticed ANY wear on the key tops. Not even a patina.

The Ivory Touch key tops on my Kawais didn't hold up for very long. This is what they would look like.

Good to know. Yea, that looks like a good amount of wear on the Kawai. Here's to hoping that Studiologic hear that potential customers want the ivory tops and makes it happen.

Here’s an interesting review on Thomann:

I've had the SL88 GT Mk2 since the beginning of June and have since moved my VPC1 to the attic. I think that says it all.

The opinion is not interesting... There should be an argument on the mechanics, the game sensations, the responsiveness, etc. I find that it looks more like gratuitous bashing if there is no explanation...

CyberGene

Let me raid that attic and rob her/him of that VPC-1!!

Cheers,

HZ

CyberGene Whoa, that's a bold statement!!! It would be interesting to see if they really did that of a good job when it comes to mimicing the baby grand piano experience in a mobile way.

Today morning I went to local music shop to buy a stand and I saw SL88 GT on display, connected to laptop with Numa VST and some small studio monitors. Few thoughts about it vs Roland's PHA50:

• While the initial resistance to move the key seemed to be similar to PHA50, I felt like I don't have to 'fight' the weight pushing against my fingers. It's hard to describe in words (especially in my non-native language), but it felt like I was 'throwing' the key, applying force only at the beginning. With Roland I feel like I have to push all the way down.
• Playing near fallboard seemed to be a bit harder than with PHA50 (difference between tip of the key and its back).
• Black keys were noticable heavier than whites, but it didn't bother me too much because it is only 'initial' resistance (as I desribed in first point).
• There was something going on with velocity curve. Sales guy said it is set to default, but I had no time to check settings. Maybe that Numa Player was the issue, but I had a feeling it is too easy to control lowest velocities, I mean - when I was playing with 'force' I would usually use to be around mp/mf, I was still in pp/p range. I was able to reach high velocities as well, but the overall impression was.. strange. Like it was 'too easy', but not in a good way.

I asked salesman if I can come with my own laptop and test it for around an hour and he said it's not a problem - so I'll probably do some more tests soon. I really liked 'feel' of the action itself, but I suspect Numa Player is responsible for spoiling the impression a bit. I really liked the look of the instrument and its form factor considering how nice action is inside.

I have the SL88 GT mk2 and play usually VSL or Pianoteq, both sound way better than the Numa Player. Coming from a Yamaha P-525 with escapement, I don’t miss it at all. As mentioned in this thread, I modified it with wooden side panels, which you can get from syntholz.de:

Vidal - new midi controller being developed

CyberGene I haven’t played the VPC1 but had a CA-99 and compared to that the TP400/wood in my SL88 GT mk2 is probably pretty close, of course it’s not all wood key sticks like on the Kawais. But I moved a Novus NV10 as a premium MIDI controller in the room where I had the Studiologic. 🤪 Now the SL88 GT mk2 is idling on a shelf in the basement. Maybe I need to sell it.

CeDur While the initial resistance to move the key seemed to be similar to PHA50, I felt like I don't have to 'fight' the weight pushing against my fingers. It's hard to describe in words (especially in my non-native language), but it felt like I was 'throwing' the key, applying force only at the beginning. With Roland I feel like I have to push all the way down.

The mechanical feel of the TP400 is probably my favorite feeling non-hybrid digital action I have ever played. It has a decent graded down weight and the up weight feels comfortable. It's a fast responding action and feels very solid on its metal frame.

CeDur Playing near fallboard seemed to be a bit harder than with PHA50 (difference between tip of the key and its back).

Yes. I also owned a FP90X and the PHA50 does have a longer pivot which makes playing at the back of the keys easier.

CeDur There was something going on with velocity curve.

It definitely reaches the highest velocity with less effort than any digital piano I've owned. That's not a good thing, but it's manageable. I like how it handles the lower velocities. The biggest problem for me with the Studiologic boards is that repeated notes can sound very irregular (some loud, some soft, some not sounding at all) because of the midi implementation. They do some weird thing with a fixed midi velocity of 4 at the middle sensor. This is preventing me from getting the MK2GT. I emailed Studiologic to see if recent firmware has changed this behavior, but they have not responded back to me and it's been almost a week.

CeDur Black keys were noticable heavier than whites, but it didn't bother me too much because it is only 'initial' resistance (as I desribed in first point).

Yes, it didn't bother me either. The black keys are lighter than the white keys on my P525. I like how you can adjust the sensitivity ratio between the black and white keys on the Studiologic boards. Can't do that on the Yamaha.

CeDur I really liked 'feel' of the action itself, but I suspect Numa Player is responsible for spoiling the impression a bit.

The Stage D was the only piano worth playing (IMO) in the SL lineup, and it has very low P and PP mapping or whatever it's called. Basically, it's extremely easy to play PP. It's unrealistically easy, but I did enjoy playing the Stage D and would play it more if I ended up with another SL board. However, I most likely won't get one until they "fix" the midi issue. I'm disappointed nobody has gotten back with me from SL.

God Bless,
David

I think the guy set Stage D. Like I mentioned, "I'll be back" there with my own laptop and test with Modern D, VSLs, Garritan and other pianos I'm familiar with.

BTW, Warsaw is a terrible place to live for someone who's fighting with GAS. I live 5min walk from one huge music store and around 20min walk from another. They have all the instruments people usually discuss online (well maybe except new NV6/NV12) to try. I was happy with my Roland as MIDI keyboard, but tried VPC1 and that SL and now I'm thinking.

CeDur Like I mentioned, "I'll be back" there with my own laptop and test with Modern D, VSLs, Garritan and other pianos I'm familiar with.

It will be interesting to read your impressions, thanks! Do you intend to try the VPC-1 there with your VSTis as well?

CeDur I live 5min walk from one huge music store and around 20min walk from another.

Aiai!

Cheers 😋,

HZ

David B The biggest problem for me with the Studiologic boards is that repeated notes can sound very irregular (some loud, some soft, some not sounding at all) because of the midi implementation. They do some weird thing with a fixed midi velocity of 4 at the middle sensor. This is preventing me from getting the MK2GT.

That sounds like a major drawback. I now remember your earlier review! It sounded too good to be true at that price point.

CeDur Like I mentioned, "I'll be back" there with my own laptop and test with Modern D, VSLs, Garritan and other pianos I'm familiar with.

Interested to read your opinions too, but keep in mind what David is saying. Don't let you be carried by the GAS.

Any new opinions on this device? Are there still velocity consistency issues?

Having watched this YouTube video, I’m leaning towards the SL88 Mk2 with TP110 over the GT Mk2. It seems better for linear velocity curve and is much lighter and easier to transport.

However, if you prefer the premium TP400 action of the GT Mk2, the video at 10:15 demonstrates a good velocity curve for it.

jenpal

Please note: the non-GT is not a piano controller. So if piano is your goal, then it isn't suitable.

Cheers!

HZ

HZPiano

Thanks HZ for the info. I’m actually looking for a lighter 88-key digital piano with a good piano feel that I can easily carry for practice/gigs. However, I’m always having second thoughts because my Yamaha P-255 with in-built speakers is so convenient to set up. So I’m still undecided about whether it’s worth buying the SL88 Mk2 and carrying it along with my laptop for VST and external speakers.

P.S. I also need a good justification for my wife if I buy another keyboard. However, I want to keep my P-255 because I usually prefer easier setup and transport.

Cheers!

jenpal

Did you consider a Roland FP-10 or FP-30X for that purpose?

Cheers!

HZ

Thanks, HZPiano. I will start digging into these. 👍

HZPiano What do you mean 'the non-GT is not a piano controller'? It has a hammer-action keybed. Not premium, but quite capable. I, and many others, use it to play piano.