MHirsch
Hello,
Thank you for a short long story that is rather useful 😀.
On PHA-4 I find it very comfortable to intentionally pick and play the quieter nuances. Every now and then I 'meet' acoustic upright pianos, and usually find that the PHA-4 is in comparison with those probably even too easy in that respect. Perhaps/probably grand piano actions are easier to accurately intend dynamics on.
PHA-4 is generally considered on the heavier side, which it is, but given proper volume settings and playing at the front ends of the keys where possible, it plays comfortably and responsively. Due to the relatively short pivot, it quickly becomes less pleasant where I need to play further back on the keys. I would like improvement there.
So now/so far I have three main clues on Kawai's RHIII:
- Stu Harrison rates it between PHA-4 and PHA-50, closer to the latter, for pianistic accuracy (see ClothEaredNincompoop );
- From our discussion here: it is a bouncy action;
- And: unpleasant to play the lower dynamics on.
Hmmm. Interesting.
Cheers and the happiest playing,
HZ