OlivierW
Before new video :
Before new video :
OlivierW Great mic mixing! You've put the piano in the center of the stage. Bravo!!!
David Lai well explained
OlivierW Thanks! How did you do that? I'd love to put the piano in the center too.
David Lai it's a mix of Cybergene presets and mine, when i upload it here, its corruptes in .txt
i trust that you can convince them to do so David, but as far as i know, there is nothing comparable to the modern d
OlivierW
beautifulđ€
OlivierW Thanks for sharing, let me do some homework. đ
OlivierW you may have to zip it first since the forum has protection against unknown extensions. I will see how to fix that but until then, use zip.
ok here the preset :
OlivierW Thanks, I'll load it in and have a look!
pianow how perfect modern u is
After a pianoless week I just played again for about half an hour. Modern U of course.
And it just sings so beautifully⊠plays so accurately⊠It is a true joy.
I've said it multiple times: without Modern U, I probably (well, highly likely) would have given up digital piano as a feasible instrument already several years ago.
Cheers, and the happiest playing,
HZ
Maybe this is related and can be relayed to @VILabs as well (and solved, I would love that):
In Modern U, also related to pedaling, sometimes releases aren't played. Modern U's releases are utterly succulent and so this is a pity. I'm not at the piano but try(!) to describe it:
I notice this the most in the bass and tenor region, perhaps because releases are most pronounced there.
I would be curious to find whether this behavior in Modern U is related scripting-wise to these resonance findings, also pedal related, in Modern D.
Anyway, Cheers!
HZ
PS Now that I think of it, in your Chopin demo, there are some busy passages in which at a few moments there also are some very abrupt endings to the sound which to me sound odd (and unpleasant). This made me think of the release experience I have with Modern U as described above. The scripts for U and D undoubtedly share a lot of code so who knows, is some or all of this indeed related. Cheers again!
Itâs hard to be objective when the only benchmark is praise, and surely, the Modern D isnât a god, so as with all things mortal, it must not be without flawsâŠ.
The first flaw is that it is sampled! đ
That being said, it doesnât mean we canât enjoy a sample every once in a while, in the same way we sometimes play dress-up, put on a wig, some old rags, and go out-and-about looking like Napoleon; yes, that can be fun (despite), and I sometimes indulge in it in the same way I indulge in samples, but the one thing I demand is some dressing (modeled resonances) atop the samples; thatâs the one thing VI-Labs proudly decided to sample instead of model. Yes, they are proud about the lack of modeled resonances, and this is odd to say the least.
Pete14 itâs odd to you, but not to me. And I have to say, your sentence âThe first flaw is that it is sampled!â Though you meant it for fun, really speaks your heart out so well.
HZPiano thanks for this, HZ! Yes, I find this interaction with resonances to be very difficult. The main problem is trying to find a condition that is consistent and able to be reproduced. So far, I havenât had success in searching for such behavior that is consistent, and continues to have bugs. The bugs seemed to come out out of very unpredictable situations. Once I find something that can be repeated, I will then submit to VI Labs. So weâll see.
Also, the UVI engine has its limitations. Its polyphony management is a problem, imo. But the engine isnât developed by VI Labs. They just use an engine thatâs developed by a different company. They are a very small team of people, so canât possibly write their own playback engine. Iâm sure that if they do come up with their own engine one day, there would be less conditions to abide by, and more easier to consider what files to continue streaming while others stop abruptly, etc. Thatâs just a thought.
imagine hating something because of its best qualities, the best part about modern u and modern d is the fact that they're 100% sampled based, but our resident troll loves artificial sound so he prefers the ptqđ
btw i finally did it, finally pressed the ignore button on this clown so that i can talk to real people about what i love not to fake chatbots about what i hateđ
another demo , MODERN D with PTQ SR Resonance :
it's an improvisation :
improvisation-modern-d-with-pianoteq-resonances-sidechained.wav
Regards,
Olivier F.
well here's the real question
now that we have modern d
do you think the good old modern u still worth it?
i personally think it is, it has a different character, very different, for a producer it can be a great alternative to the modern d, especially when you wanna make a mellow music of course a deeply sampled steinway can be excellent, but having a small upright sound can be the weapon of choice there.
but that's how i feel about it, what do you guys think?
David Lai Finally had a chance to listen to all of your sound demos on the VI Labs site - outstanding playing as always. Congratulations.
Quick question - do you happen to remember exactly what settings (Mics, reverb, tone knobs, etc.) you used for the Mozart sonata K. 333?
That particular mix sounds practically ideal to me - it's so present and real. I don't think I would ever have suspected it was recorded on a virtual piano if I hadn't known.