David B Joannchr Classical recordings on CD or Vinyl of our favourite pianists are also a montage of various takes + enrichment/mixing of the audio.
I never knew that.
Sadly that is the state of the affair for most recordings, and it has been so for a while.
Joannchr David B you know sometimes it is more authentic that way . For the anecdote best recording of Ravel concerto for left hand was a recording from Samson Francois , probably the best Ravel interpreter . There was a few mistakes in the recording but overall it was an exceptional piece of art . The music company wanted to take a second shot but Samson F. refused and said that he preferred to stick with that recording as he felt it was magical and it was more important than some bump notes.
Oh absolutely. Luckly, there still are live recordings. Music a performing art, and the immediacy of the performance, and the "magic" of the moment is its best IMHO. This is obviously true in jazz, but it was true in "classical" music too, more or less until the rise of the recording devices, when perfection started to become a fixation of the performers. I have some books of that era (*) in which they go at great length on what the performer should be concentrate on, and it's shockingly how different the recommendations are for concerts vs recording.
I like a lot Phil Best's quote that there are no wrong notes and no wrong rhythms, as long as what you play is what you mean (which I guess for lowly amateurs like myself is the crux….)
(*) for example this one
https://www.amazon.com/Piano-Technique-Dover-Books-Music/dp/0486228673