QuasiUnaFantasia I would have guessed that quote originated from Pete14, the zany comedian, rather than from the earnest Pete14, although the earnest one might have steered the zany one a bit there.
Maybe you're right, but that's more of a reflection on my ignorance regarding piano technique. I'd like to hear more from earnest Pete, but I also appreciate zany Pete because he makes forum life more colorful and interesting.
God Bless,
David
š
When reading said post by p.14, I had thoughts along those same lines š.
The van by the way has been seen moving, slowly, because it's an old van, and therefore starting its journey really really early, in the direction of Anaheim, CA. Utilising several carwashes along the way, rendering most of them unusable afterwards for the next customers in line. Nasty stuff near those rivers.
Cheers!
HZ
Just the GFIII action and a Roland-quality level MIDI implementation. Aesthetically, just as the VPC is now.
There have been rumors that the GFC action could be selected instead. That would be a fatal error in my perspective, which I have mentioned a couple of times hoping Kawai James would pick up and relay the signal towards the proper ears. I have no illusions about that but hey, a lad can tryā¦
Cheers and happy anticipation,
HZ
Jose EB5AGV I am glad my playing level does not need that š
š
My thoughts exactly š¶.
Cheers and the happiest playing,
HZ
David B I honestly don't appreciate zany Pete, because he makes me angry. To put it idiomatically, he sometimes gets my goat.
HZPiano Haha, I can see where you're coming from.
David Lai My problem is that the repeated C-sharps are already alternating between left and right handsā¦ And the keys can only respond at a certain speed.
You're right. I have difficulty with that repetition on the VPC1 also - it's easier to play on my acoustic.
dore_m Now this is making me curious. Are there digital actions that do well with repetations like what's found in Rhapsody in Blue, for example?
I have an MP10 that feels like the VPC1 but it only has a double sensor. I'm surprised that the repetition isn't good on the VPC1 as it has a triple-sensor action. I don't like the keys on the VPC1. The short pivot makes some pieces difficult to play in a way they are not on a grand.
I have no problem with fast repeated notes on my Roland FP-90. It's not as easy as on my acoustic, but I don't have any problem practising on my digital and moving to the grand.
David Lai Now this is making me curious. Are there digital actions that do well with repetations like what's found in Rhapsody in Blue, for example?
Actually, I don't know. I don't have much experience with digital actions other than my VPC1. But I suppose those repetitions in Rhapsody are harder to play because they are on the black keys, which have a shorter pivot (?)
dore_m the black keys, which have a shorter pivot (?)
Hello,
One of the nice aspects of the VPC1's RM3II action is that the white and black key pivot points are staggered, just as in "real" piano actions.
This compensates (to a certain extent) for the shorter black key length in a likewise way as it is compensated for (to a certain extent) in regular acoustic actions.
Cheers!
HZ
Thatās a pretty bad feedback for a keyboard thatās targeted at serious pianists. Kawai desperately need to update it.
Johnstaf I have an MP10 that feels like the VPC1 but it only has a double sensor. I'm surprised that the repetition isn't good on the VPC1 as it has a triple-sensor action. I don't like the keys on the VPC1. The short pivot makes some pieces difficult to play in a way they are not on a grand.
Earnest Pete, here! š¤
The action in the MP10 was one of my favorites; to the point that I swore to never again use a āfoldedā action, and, whilst itās purported to be the same action used in the VPC-1 (plus one more sensor), and the overall implication is that the RM3-II is ābetter,ā I preferred the MP10/RM3; which has brought me to the conclusion that the end result isnāt always a direct result of the sum of its parts, but rather how these āpartsā work together (and that includes the interfacing between sensors and motherboard, and, in the case of a digital with on-board sounds, the sound engineā¦.
I no longer feel that a long wooden stick balanced on a pivot is inherently better than a well-designed āfoldedā action (like the NWX, for example š), and yes, Mac is right, āthe proof is in the puddingā (in other words, these instruments have to be played; because sometimes the specs donāt tell the full story)ā¦.
CyberGene Kawai desperately need to update it.
In a thread on PW recently, I believe Kawai James made it clear that the VPC 1 would be updated eventually. Someone was suggesting that the MP lineup was done or going to be discontinued and KJ put the kibosh on that quite clearly. I asked about the VPC1 and he put it in the same category as the MP series indicating the Kawai was not done with it either.
3 things need to be updated on the VPC1.
New action. Get rid of the dreaded slip tape. I can't see myself buying a Kawai that has slip tape on the action. GF3 will do.
Get rid of the Fatar pedal because it sucks. The same one came with my Numa and I use Roland pedals. The MP optical pedal will work.
Midi 2.0 with the ability for single note sensitivity editing.
They'd possibly have a winner with the above specs for the next twelve years or more. The VPC1 was introduced in 2013.
God Bless,
David
Yes, the pedal! I forgot about that in my response to your earlier "update specs" post. Probably, I'm so used to having my own pedals and interface thatā¦ I just forgot about the dreaded Fatar pedal set.
As for MIDI 2.0: Nah, indifferent.
As for per-note MIDI settings/edit: Yes, that would be good.
Well, NAMM is fast approaching, so we'll see what happens. As you are "just around the corner", relatively speaking, take a discrete vehicle and go spy on Kawai for us. As Pete will be doing so for Yamaha, the two of you could have a coffee, vegetable shake, or even lunch together.
And, naturally, report back to us on all aspects and findings, including those concerning your spy-collegue.
Cheers,
HZ
Iām not really sure a wooden stick action offers anything more than a folded plastic action. They rather up their game and think of a controller with an actual grand piano action but that would be expensive. Or a new type of mechanism with actual escapement. Other than that it wonāt offer anything interesting, any stage piano is basically the same in terms of mechanism and MIDI implementation.
CyberGene Or a new type of mechanism with actual escapement.
If someone would manage to do that without the bulk of a hybrid it would be a big leap forward for DP:s.
If they do come out with a VPC 2 with an improved action, I'll have to seriously consider it, as it's the most space-saving setup for me.
Pete14 I no longer feel that a long wooden stick balanced on a pivot is inherently better than a well-designed āfoldedā action (like the NWX, for example š), and yes, Mac is right, āthe proof is in the puddingā (in other words, these instruments have to be played; because sometimes the specs donāt tell the full story)ā¦.
Agree 100%. After all the online discussion about key length, pivot point, full stick vs. folded, etc. I was expecting this to be "the" major differentiator amongst various actions, but once I started going out and demoing them myself, I found that it was almost a non-factor. Plenty of folded actions felt just as good (if not better) than many of the full key stick and hybrid actions, and a few additional centimeters in pivot length made far less of an impact than online chatter or industry PR had led me to expect.
In fact, several of the full hybrid models felt among the least appealing to me - heavy and sluggish and not particularly enjoyable to play. Closer to a not very well-maintained upright than a properly conditioned grand.
jdg78 That's true. But, I would have enjoyed a few extra CM on the black keys so I can play the repetitions with more space, as 2 hands alternate between the black key notes.