Modern D vs Pianoteq vs The People

Hey, what about all us peoles!?

David B Thank you, now my phone and laptop's text-to-speech voices are happy! 🙂 Thanks.

OlivierW

Olivier - the scripts you have written for your VSL-D+Ptq and VI Modern D+Ptq are really impressive. I appreciate that you previously published your Reaper script for the VSL-D/Ptq resonance setup. Could you offer any advice for the Reaper-script equivalent of your Logic 11 script for the ModernD/Ptq setup? Further, I would love to know how you figured out how to code the note-off behavior for you N1X. I have a Casio GP-300 that sends note-off info and I would like to take a crack at that.
Thanks also for sharing your knowledge and presets, etc. I've learned a lot.

doctae Here's a Reaper template that integrates Olivier's script with the VSL Synchron CFX running through Pianoteq's resonator. The site is renaming it to a .txt when I upload it, but I assume you can just change this back to .rpp and open in Reaper.

I'm a total Reaper noob, so I'm not sure if this is the best way to share the settings. Let me know if it doesn't work and I'm happy to try something else.

EDIT: forgot to attach the Pianoteq preset. If you don't have the Steinway, just pick a piano and set the velocity curve to a flat 0 across the whole thing so the hammers never hit the strings, but the dampers mirror what you're playing on whatever sample library you're using. The site renamed that file to cfx-resonance.bin but just change that to cfx-resonance.fxp and it'll load in Pianoteq.

Mindbullets

Thanks I'll check it out when I'm back at the PC, and report back.

Mr. Bullet - I'm familiar with setting up Reaper with VSL pianos and side chaining w/Pianoteq. Olivier had previously shared a reaper script + rpp. Your rpp would be useable except it doesn't include the script file (if different that Olivier's). What I'm inquiring about is coding issues - more details about O's code and Logic > Reaper translation. But more interested in his code itself.

doctae

Oh weird! I didn't realize it didn't save in the project file. Here's the script. It's all the same logic as Olivier's, I think I just renamed a few vars while debugging so it made more sense (to me) what was going on.

desc: Reaper Script to enable silent key for VSL Pianos and disable VSL Sustain samples for use with Pianoteq
desc: 12/3/2023 - Olivier W. Frappier

@init
sustainVal = 0;        // current sustain value from the original MIDI
overrideActive = 0;    // are we currently overriding sustainVal?

minVelocity = 2;       // minimum velocity (anything lower will silent-key)

controlChange = 176;   // status byte 176 = control change
sustainPedal = 64;     // cc 64 = sustain
noteOnCmd = $x90;      // command 0x90 = note on 

@slider

@block
  overrideActive == 1 ? (
    // clear sustain pedal override
    midisend(ts, controlChange, sustainPedal, sustainVal);
    noteOnState = 0;
  );
 
  // intercept MIDI messages
  while (midirecv(offset, msg1, msg2, msg3)) (
    ((msg2 == sustainPedal) && (msg1 == controlChange)) ? (
      sustainVal = msg3;
    );

    // is it a note-on?
    msg1 == noteOnCmd ? ( 
      // override sustain pedal value to 0 to trigger pedal-up (dampers-down) sample
      midisend(ts, controlChange, sustainPedal, 0); 
      overrideActive = 1;
      
      // if the note velocity is below the minimum, drop it to 0 so VSL will silent-key
      msg3 < minVelocity ? msg3 = 0; ( 
        midisend(offset, msg1, msg2, msg3);
      )
    ) : (
      // pass through other events
      midisend(offset, msg1, msg2, msg3);
    )
  );

I ask this out of genuine cusiosity. If Pianoteq is so bad, why do most of the top brands endorse it and let them use names and models, whereas the other VI creators have to make up suggestive names for their instruments?

amc252 easy. Pianoteq pays to those brands because if it bears no real name, nobody will recognize what that sound is, they all sound the same: synthetic. Sampled pianos don’t have to convince you, it’s sure they recorded a real piano, so they can save on royalties.

I don’t believe in the “endorse” theory. If it was true, how come VSL and Garritan were “endorsed” by Yamaha and not Modartt?

BTW, there’s a contradiction with Pianoteq. Everybody tells you that modeling is so powerful, you can tweak it to sound like every piano in the world. Yet, they can keep on purchasing new models, instead of exchanging free presets that can supposedly do the same? Or not? 🧐

amc252
the same reason why we don't label the foods in our fridges, we already know what they are because of how they look, smell and taste like.
but every ptq model sounds like the others so they had to label them to (maybe) avoid confusion.

CyberGene easy. Pianoteq pays to those brands because if they don’t mention a real name, nobody will recognize what that sound is, they all sound the same, synthetic. Sampled pianos don’t have to convince you, it’s sure they recorded a real piano, so they can save on royalties.

That would have been my guess. Now, I have no idea what the numbers are in terms of money involved in the VI business vs acoustic pianos. But a company like Steinway, which does not allow anyone to put a Steinway sticker on their rebuilt pianos unless they have been rebuit by Steinway, seems to be pretty serious about their brand identity. That they would allow something that sound like a generic piano to be sold as a specific Steinway model seem odd. Are they strugging so badly finacially or are Modartt's pockets so deep?

amc252 sampled pianos also use the Steinway name. The endorse theory is wrong because endorsing means: this is our official virtual piano equivalent. There can’t be many, only one. Yet, there are many. So, no, it’s not endorsing, they just get paid to allow you to use the Steinway brand.

pianow but every ptq model sounds like the others so they had to label them to (maybe) avoid confusion.

I beg to differ on this point. Even to my unexpert ears, each Pianoteq piano sounds quite distinctive. Whether they sound good or anywhere close the real thing is another matter, of course.

amc252 I ask this out of genuine cusiosity. If Pianoteq is so bad, why do most of the top brands endorse it and let them use names and models, whereas the other VI creators have to make up suggestive names for their instruments?

🤔

CyberGene BTW, there’s a contradiction with Pianoteq. Everybody tells you that modeling is so powerful, you can tweak it to sound like every piano in the world. Yet, they can keep on purchasing new models, instead of exchanging free presets that can supposedly do the same? Or not? 🧐

Well, if it isn’t the pot calling the kettle black!

You people jump at the first announcement of a “new” piano; even though it’s usually the same old beaten up D; whence you could’ve just tweaked your existing “presets.”

Pete14 that’s a deflection. You didn’t answer 😉

😇

CyberGene Yet, they can keep on purchasing new models, instead of exchanging free presets that can supposedly do the same? Or not?

It's my understanding that certain parameters aren't controllable through the UI or saveable in an FXP. I agree there's a certain Pianoteq "flavor" that's baked into every model, but there are other timbral distinctions that change from model to model via private/hidden params in the model (e.g. I'll never get the pteq 1922 Erard to sound like the 280 VC).

I never liked diet soda, though I could always tell which high-fructose corn syrup counterpart they were trying to mimic. Regardless, they all still tasted "diet" in the same way to me, and that was the overwhelming flavor that put me off (back when I drank any of that garbage). My wife was the opposite and hated the full sugar sodas, but loved aspartame.

Anyway, I feel like something similar is at the root of all this Pianoteq polarization. Different strokes I guess.