OlivierW
jdg78 same feeling here 🙂
jdg78 same feeling here 🙂
This is interesting. My impressions are that the N1X and the Numa X GT are quite different in velocity respons especially regarding how easy/hard it is to reach the highest velocity values, but I might be wrong. Maybe @David B or @CyberGene could fill in on that as you own/have owned both pianos? Maybe a well made product as the modern D has a greater tolerance and feels natural on a greater variety of midi keyboard with different midi responses than other pianos?
jdg78 To be honest, I'm not sure what advantage this would bring since the only thing a human could introduce is greater inconsistency
I agree. I'm thinking using built in player systems such as Disklavier or Spirio should be optimal to reach consistent velocity response in a sampling process.
johanibraaten This is interesting. My impressions are that the N1X and the Numa X GT are quite different in velocity respons especially regarding how easy/hard it is to reach the highest velocity values, but I might be wrong.
To be fair, when I first got the Numa X GT, I spent quite a bit of time adjusting the touch response to fit my own personal preferences. One of the big advantages of this model is that it's possible to make precise adjustments to the touch sensitivity and midi output of each individual key so that you can effectively regulate the entire keyboard however you'd like.
Since doing this, I find that I don't need to adjust the velocity response of individual off-board instruments quite as much as I used to, though some still require a bit of additional intervention.
Ah I see. Of course, that seems like a logical explanation. I’m used to my my N1 that doesn’t seem to change the midi output when the internal touch sensitivity is changed so I always have to adjust in the external software.
johanibraaten There's always this balancing act, it looks like -- either modify the keyboard, or adjust the software. For me, I prefer adjusting from the hardware part as not all software UI is natively accessible.
Do we have already any convention in which are the best settings (on headphones at least)? Like Modern U Thread
I am enjoying too much this library for the past days, can't go back to any other, feels so good, but wondering which settings are using everybody
Infinito I keep going back between the close + player, side + player, side + room, reverb on / off, ETC. I haven't settled on anything. All to me are good.
this afternoon, after i got free from work i went back to the old native instruments maverick
and oddly enough i enjoyed it more then ever after dialing it a bit
i asked myself how close the modern d can be (given the fact that they're two completely different pianos, one is modern other is vintage, one is a semi concert grand, other's a 9 foot one, but anyway... what do you guys think about similarities?
the grandeur and maverick are still some of the best pianos around imo
pianow I love the grandeur and how it was prepared and sampled. But The maverick has some tuning issues. However, since it's a vintage, restored instrument, we can be gentle about it.
My main concern, though, is still that both instruments do not contain una corda samples, this gives Modern D the edge of being more fully featured. And with more velocity layers and detail, the Modern D also has a better response.
David Lai
of course, i was thinking about the sound of these instruments actually
how the grandeur and maverick compare to the modern d sound wise?
i know about the feature set
btw the grandeur was my first piano that has sampled resonances, i used to adore this thing, i still love it of course but it was a romantic relationship back in the day
it sounds GOOD
and one of the reasons i love vsl imperial is that it has a similar tone and the recording techniques are very close in my opinion
but what about the MD
how close is it?
pianow Well, I'm a bit limited in time, but I'll let a blind comparison help me speak.
Someone on VI Control posted the following demo. They tried matching the response curves between the 7 libraries. They recorded a midi and copied it 7 times and pasted with different piano VIs. Have fun listening
Featured libraries:
Ivory II American D
Session Keys Grand S
NI The Grandeur
VI Labs True Keys American
Pianoteq 8 NY Steinway D
IK-M Pianoverse NY Grand S274
Cinesamples Piano in Blue
The tone similarities are ordered. Happy listening!
Note, this was posted by someone else, not my playing.
thank davy, i saw this on the VIC forum but idk why i don't have access to the website
i never had actually
pianow OK, just a moment. I'm making a "blind listen review" file. I'll post it here shortly.
OK, Microsoft Jenny will announce every time the pianos change. Have fun
wow that was excellent, thanks buddy
it's amazing how most of them have that steinway sound to them
it's truly hard to pick one over the others
i enjoyed most of them
pianow it's truly hard to pick one over the others
With sound, sometimes it is hard to pick. But when you put feature set into consideration, the decision wouldn't be too difficult to make.
session keys grand ass💀💀💀
pianow LOL, she said S, not ASS! 🙂 It's a speech synthesizer problem. The S followed the grand very closely, that's why. 🙂
David Lai
i know I'm just making fun out of things😂
but if a company would name there piano grand ass, i would buy it immediately