Hey, you two! I’ll have you know that Kurzweil is a genius inventor and futurist!
And whilst I use my balls (made of crystal) to predict the future, he uses hard data 📈, and yes, his prediction, “singularity, I say,” was thought preposterous back in the 70s; yet now, those very “experts” are saying, “perhaps he’s right.”
Per freaking-usual, the so-called “experts” claim expertise (redundant, I know), but never get it right, yet in hindsight they will always claim, “oh yes, I always saw the singularity coming; only I needed a little more data to confirm it back then”………BS!
Don’t you see, we’re now talking about AI overtaking us (yes, The Terminator is coming for you), whilst quantum computers will take seconds to figure out a cure for Cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and the meaning of it all, “why are we here, Daddy?”
Do you think it a challenge for a quantum-based Terminator 2.0 to figure out the piano?
In half a second AI will figure out the piano, and then what? will you stick to your precious samples running on an outdated thing called a desktop; using nothing but ON/OFF commands; whereas, Q-bits will attack the piano from all angles at the same time (not just 0/1; ON/OFF)?
Don’t say I didn’t warn you:
Start dumping them samples on unsuspecting suckers NOW; whilst the samples are still worth something.
“But Pete, I’ll lose some money if I trade my samples now,” you say; and yes, that is true, but isn’t it better to cut you losses short now instead of losing it all a few years down the road?
P.S.
I’m trying to help you, stubborn samplers, yet what do I get in return? it ain’t love; that’s for sure!