Virtual piano comparison

CyberGene I can hear little details in Garritan that are ever so tiny but make it alive whereas in Pianoteq there’s a certain sameness to the sound and that’s a paradox for me because it’s the samples that are expected to be static.

In recent versions, Pianoteq introduced humanization options, so quite a few parameters can be configured to vary slightly during a performance. There's also the condition slider which makes the piano not so perfect. I don't think this is enabled by default in any of the presets.

I also can't really tell if humanization makes a difference or not. I enabled all the settings on my recent recording. 😆

Pianoteq Steinway after all... What a trickster, CG... Curiously, I desliked more the bass notes than the middle octaves. I was betting that piano 1 was ModernU with the bass ramped up. But Pianoteq was also a possibility because the bass sounded like pianoteq: deep and thunderous but lacking higher frequency harmonics. Piano 2 I guessed correctly.
If you want to know how that sounds in VSL Steinway, I can render the midi file.

Btw, i was again without access to PC for several hours... Strange...

vagfilm It seems every time we have these blind tests, someone finds they like Pianoteq when they previously thought that they didn't!

If I recall correctly, that was also a turning point for me. Someone had posted some blind tests on PianoWorld and I found myself liking the Pianoteq renderings quite a bit.

I never said Pianoteq was awfully bad. I said many times that the dynamic range of pianoteq is better than many built-in sound engines of digital pianos, and that is a plus... I would probably gladly change an internal sound for the Petrof Mistral. But there a number of sampled VSTs that sounds far more realistic than pianoteq (while there are way more sampled VSTs that I like less than pianoteq).
I like recordings with less ambient sound, and that is why I preferred piano #1, despite its flaws. But if both #1 and #2 had the same level of reverb, I am sure that I would have preferred #2. BTW, I have Garritan CFX and it is not my current favourite VST.
I am an enthusiast of pianoteq, and will buy it one day... At this moment, my ears get tired after 10-15 minutes.

vagfilm I am an enthusiast of pianoteq, and will buy it one day... At this moment, my ears get tired after 10-15 minutes.

Yeah, Piano 1 is a little too twangy for me. I can see how ear fatigue would set in more quickly using it. That's why I preferred Piano 2.

God Bless,
David

Here are the MIDI files:

Feel free to re-render them with other virtual pianos. @vagfilm, it would be interesting to hear them with VSL.

It takes forever to upload with my slow internet (1 megabit per second).

Here are Gene's midi files rendered with my VSL Bösendorfer Imperial Grand. I have the VSL velocity curve setup for my N1X (I use the N1X default touch sensitivity and I think Gene does also) so it should sound the same if played on both instruments.

God Bless,
David

Here are the two compositions rendered using one of my favourite (home made) presets for Ivory II Bösendorfer 225:

Both files rendered in Reaper using VSL D274 (custom preset of ~ 60% close condenser mic and 40% mid decca mic). Your max midi value is around 100 (and usually it wavers between 30 and 60) so this is a well tamed D274.

This is direct from reaper. Forgot to normalize on audacity.

A couple of things jump out at me as I read through this thread. I mentioned in another thread about the preferences of European pianos for Europeans, and American pianos for Americans (a theory) - now I am wondering if, when you improvise, that you tend to play in a particular piano range. I prefer the tenor (fat American sound), so I play alot of stuff like Linus and Lucy (peanuts) and don't improvise too far above middle C. And I wonder if this affects the type of piano you prefer.

The other thing is that this crowd sourcing of piano sounds can really help me with my next library. I may create another thread about this, but I would post a MIDI file to be rendered - single notes at different piano ranges with different velocities, and then have 'clackers render them and post which controller they use along with the piano library they're using. I could then compare the output sound and get a rough idea of the velocity scaling. Not exactly the velocity curve, but at least the dynamic range of each keyboard section (ie, C1-C2, C5-C6)

BTW, does anyone have a Fazioli sample library they can use to render Cybergene's midi file?

Both of the VSL samples are far nicer, in my opinion, than either PTQ or Garritan. Cleaner, less overtones (muddiness?). Your improvised playing is quite good, Gene.

Here are renderings from my free Fazioli F308 library. I thought about also including renderings from other free libraries to make the F308 library sound really good…. ha ha.

Anyway, if anyone else has a commercial Fazioli library, I'd love to compare.

Wow... Your Fazioli library sounds really impressive. The loud middle section (around 1:00) is as clear as in the VSLs and, in my opinion, better than Garritan. It is very bright and for that reason it is not to my personal taste, but I am in the minority and I think the library captures well the shimmering character of that piano. Congrats...

I’m in the midst of a Sunday evening home chores/madness, so I’ll wait for the family to go to bed and will listen to all these renderings later 👍🏻

vagfilm

Yup. It's bright. I put a hidden filter in the kontakt version to tamp down the brightness at lower velocities.

It's occuring to me that I may never hit the vsl quality because my mics, while very good, are not the $3-5k mics that the pros use.

dore_m It's occuring to me that I may never hit the vsl quality because my mics, while very good, are not the $3-5k mics that the pros use.

You should be happy thinking "there are pros out there that use $3-5k mics and publish crap..."

TomLC Someone deleted my post?

I deleted my post because I forgot to normalize my audio file. I reposted